Jeremy Bentham citátov

Jeremy Bentham fotka
11   205

Jeremy Bentham

Dátum narodenia: 15. február 1748
Dátum úmrtia: 6. jún 1832

Jeremy Bentham bol anglický etik a právnik, teoretik liberalizmu.

Citáty Jeremy Bentham

„Milujúca žena túži byť mužovi slúžkou; zaľúbený muž sa bojí jedného: byť žene sluhom.“

—  Jeremy Bentham

Varianta: Zamilovaná žena túži byť mužovi slúžkou. Zamilovaný muž sa bojí jediného - byť žene sluhom.

Help us translate English quotes

Discover interesting quotes and translate them.

Start translating

„Judges of elegance and taste consider themselves as benefactors to the human race, whilst they are really only the interrupters of their pleasure“

—  Jeremy Bentham

Théorie des peines et des récompenses (1811); translation by Richard Smith, The Rationale of Reward, J. & H. L. Hunt, London, 1825, Bk. 3, Ch. 1
Kontext: Judges of elegance and taste consider themselves as benefactors to the human race, whilst they are really only the interrupters of their pleasure … There is no taste which deserves the epithet good, unless it be the taste for such employments which, to the pleasure actually produced by them, conjoin some contingent or future utility: there is no taste which deserves to be characterized as bad, unless it be a taste for some occupation which has mischievous tendency.

„The day may come when the rest of the animal creation may acquire those rights which never could have been withholden from them but by the hand of tyranny.“

—  Jeremy Bentham, kniha An Introduction to the Principles of Morals and Legislation

Zdroj: An Introduction to the Principles of Morals and Legislation (1789; 1823), Ch. 17 : Of the Limits of the Penal Branch of Jurisprudence
Kontext: The day has been, I grieve to say in many places it is not yet past, in which the greater part of the species, under the denomination of slaves, have been treated by the law exactly upon the same footing as, in England for example, the inferior races of animals are still. The day may come when the rest of the animal creation may acquire those rights which never could have been withholden from them but by the hand of tyranny. The French have already discovered that the blackness of the skin is no reason why a human being should be abandoned without redress to the caprice of a tormentor. It may one day come to be recognized that the number of legs, the villosity of the skin, or the termination of the os sacrum are reasons equally insufficient for abandoning a sensitive being to the same fate. What else is it that should trace the insuperable line? Is it the faculty of reason, or perhaps the faculty of discourse? But a full-grown horse or dog is beyond comparison a more rational, as well as a more conversable animal, than an infant of a day or a week or even a month, old. But suppose they were otherwise, what would it avail? The question is not Can they reason?, nor Can they talk?, but Can they suffer?

„Nature has placed mankind under the governance of two sovereign masters, pain and pleasure. It is for them alone to point out what we ought to do, as well as to determine what we shall do.“

—  Jeremy Bentham, kniha An Introduction to the Principles of Morals and Legislation

Zdroj: An Introduction to the Principles of Morals and Legislation (1789; 1823), Ch. 1 : Of the Principle of Utility
Kontext: Nature has placed mankind under the governance of two sovereign masters, pain and pleasure. It is for them alone to point out what we ought to do, as well as to determine what we shall do. On the one hand the standard of right and wrong, on the other the chain of causes and effects, are fastened to their throne. They govern us in all we do, in all we say, in all we think: every effort we can make to throw off our subjection, will serve but to demonstrate and confirm it. In words a man may pretend to abjure their empire: but in reality he will remain subject to it all the while. The principle of utility recognizes this subjection, and assumes it for the foundation of that system, the object of which is to rear the fabric of felicity by the hands of reason and of law. Systems which attempt to question it, deal in sounds instead of sense, in caprice instead of reason, in darkness instead of light.

„Every law is an evil, for every law is an infraction of liberty: And I repeat that government has but a choice of evils“

—  Jeremy Bentham

Principles of Legislation (1830), Ch. X : Analysis of Political Good and Evil; How they are spread in society
Kontext: It is with government, as with medicine. They have both but a choice of evils. Every law is an evil, for every law is an infraction of liberty: And I repeat that government has but a choice of evils: In making this choice, what ought to be the object of the legislator? He ought to assure himself of two things; 1st, that in every case, the incidents which he tries to prevent are really evils; and 2ndly, that if evils, they are greater than those which he employs to prevent them.
There are then two things to be regarded; the evil of the offence and the evil of the law; the evil of the malady and the evil of the remedy.
An evil comes rarely alone. A lot of evil cannot well fall upon an individual without spreading itself about him, as about a common centre. In the course of its progress we see it take different shapes: we see evil of one kind issue from evil of another kind; evil proceed from good and good from evil. All these changes, it is important to know and to distinguish; in this, in fact, consists the essence of legislation.

„He ought to assure himself of two things; 1st, that in every case, the incidents which he tries to prevent are really evils; and 2ndly, that if evils, they are greater than those which he employs to prevent them.“

—  Jeremy Bentham

Principles of Legislation (1830), Ch. X : Analysis of Political Good and Evil; How they are spread in society
Kontext: It is with government, as with medicine. They have both but a choice of evils. Every law is an evil, for every law is an infraction of liberty: And I repeat that government has but a choice of evils: In making this choice, what ought to be the object of the legislator? He ought to assure himself of two things; 1st, that in every case, the incidents which he tries to prevent are really evils; and 2ndly, that if evils, they are greater than those which he employs to prevent them.
There are then two things to be regarded; the evil of the offence and the evil of the law; the evil of the malady and the evil of the remedy.
An evil comes rarely alone. A lot of evil cannot well fall upon an individual without spreading itself about him, as about a common centre. In the course of its progress we see it take different shapes: we see evil of one kind issue from evil of another kind; evil proceed from good and good from evil. All these changes, it is important to know and to distinguish; in this, in fact, consists the essence of legislation.

„That which has no existence cannot be destroyed — that which cannot be destroyed cannot require anything to preserve it from destruction. Natural rights is simple nonsense: natural and imprescriptible rights, rhetorical nonsense — nonsense upon stilts.“

—  Jeremy Bentham

A Critical Examination of the Declaration of Rights
Anarchical Fallacies (1843)
Kontext: That which has no existence cannot be destroyed — that which cannot be destroyed cannot require anything to preserve it from destruction. Natural rights is simple nonsense: natural and imprescriptible rights, rhetorical nonsense — nonsense upon stilts. But this rhetorical nonsense ends in the old strain of mischievous nonsense for immediately a list of these pretended natural rights is given, and those are so expressed as to present to view legal rights. And of these rights, whatever they are, there is not, it seems, any one of which any government can, upon any occasion whatever, abrogate the smallest particle.

„The question is not Can they reason?, nor Can they talk?, but Can they suffer?“

—  Jeremy Bentham, kniha An Introduction to the Principles of Morals and Legislation

Zdroj: An Introduction to the Principles of Morals and Legislation (1789; 1823), Ch. 17 : Of the Limits of the Penal Branch of Jurisprudence
Zdroj: The Principles of Morals and Legislation
Kontext: The day has been, I grieve to say in many places it is not yet past, in which the greater part of the species, under the denomination of slaves, have been treated by the law exactly upon the same footing as, in England for example, the inferior races of animals are still. The day may come when the rest of the animal creation may acquire those rights which never could have been withholden from them but by the hand of tyranny. The French have already discovered that the blackness of the skin is no reason why a human being should be abandoned without redress to the caprice of a tormentor. It may one day come to be recognized that the number of legs, the villosity of the skin, or the termination of the os sacrum are reasons equally insufficient for abandoning a sensitive being to the same fate. What else is it that should trace the insuperable line? Is it the faculty of reason, or perhaps the faculty of discourse? But a full-grown horse or dog is beyond comparison a more rational, as well as a more conversable animal, than an infant of a day or a week or even a month, old. But suppose they were otherwise, what would it avail? The question is not Can they reason?, nor Can they talk?, but Can they suffer?

„Create all the happiness you are able to create: remove all the misery you are able to remove.“

—  Jeremy Bentham

Advise to a young girl (22 June 1830)
Kontext: Create all the happiness you are able to create: remove all the misery you are able to remove. Every day will allow you to add something to the pleasure of others, or to diminish something of their pains. And for every grain of enjoyment you sow in the bosom of another, you shall find a harvest in your own bosom; while every sorrow which you pluck out from the thoughts and feelings of a fellow creature shall be replaced by beautiful peace and joy in the sanctuary of your soul.

„Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetuer adipiscing elit. Etiam egestas wisi a erat. Morbi imperdiet, mauris ac auctor dictum.“

Podobní autori

Johann Heinrich Pestalozzi fotka
Johann Heinrich Pestalozzi14
švajčiarsky pedagóg a reformátor vzdelávania
John Locke fotka
John Locke12
anglický filozof a lekár
Francis Bacon fotka
Francis Bacon105
anglický filozof, štátnik, vedec, právnik a autor
Philip Stanhope Chesterfield fotka
Philip Stanhope Chesterfield17
britský štátnik a spisovateľ
Isaac Newton fotka
Isaac Newton16
britský fyzik a matematik a zakladateľ modernej klasickej f…
Denis Diderot fotka
Denis Diderot11
francúzsky osvietenský filozof a encyklopedista
Richard Brinsley Sheridan fotka
Richard Brinsley Sheridan2
britský politik
David Hume fotka
David Hume8
škótsky filozof, ekonóm a historik
Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz fotka
Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz1
nemecký matematik a filozof
Baruch Spinoza fotka
Baruch Spinoza26
holandský filozof
Dnešné výročie
Paul Gauguin fotka
Paul Gauguin12
francúzsky post-impresionistický umelec 1848 - 1903
Orhan Pamuk fotka
Orhan Pamuk1
turecký spisovateľ 1952
Dorothy Parker fotka
Dorothy Parker3
americká poetka, autorka poviedok, kritička a satirička 1893 - 1967
Henry Miller fotka
Henry Miller10
americký románopisec 1891 - 1980
Ďalších 19 výročí
Podobní autori
Johann Heinrich Pestalozzi fotka
Johann Heinrich Pestalozzi14
švajčiarsky pedagóg a reformátor vzdelávania
John Locke fotka
John Locke12
anglický filozof a lekár
Francis Bacon fotka
Francis Bacon105
anglický filozof, štátnik, vedec, právnik a autor
Philip Stanhope Chesterfield fotka
Philip Stanhope Chesterfield17
britský štátnik a spisovateľ
Isaac Newton fotka
Isaac Newton16
britský fyzik a matematik a zakladateľ modernej klasickej f…
x