Søren Kierkegaard citáty page 7

„Keď ma stigmatizujete, popriete ma.“

„Ľudia požadujú slobodu prejavu ako kompenzáciu za slobodu myslenia, ktorú zriedka využívajú.“

„Život nie je problém, ktorý treba vyriešiť, ale realita, ktorú treba zažiť.“

„Najbežnejšou formou zúfalstva je nebyť tým, kým ste.“

„Šťastie je najlepšou skrýšou pre zúfalstvo.“

„Nebolo tvojím veľkým šťastím, že si nikdy nemohol tak milovať, ako si bol milovaný?“

Søren Kierkegaard Citáty o láske

„Pomáhať inému človeku, aby miloval Boha, znamená milovať ho; byť podporovaný v láske k Bohu iným človekom znamená byť milovaný.“

Prisudzované výroky

„Láske treba uveriť a musí sa žiť.“

Prisudzované výroky

„Láska k Bohu a láska k blížnemu sú dve krídla dverí, ktoré sa nedajú otvoriť ani zavrieť samostatne.“

Potvrdené výroky
Zdroj: [79]

„Svet sa skladá zo samých príležitostí k láske.“

Potvrdené výroky
Zdroj: [20]

„Milovať človeka znamená: pomôcť mu milovať Boha.“

„Je úplnou pravdou, ako hovoria filozofi, že život treba chápať spätne. Zabúdajú však na ďalšie tvrdenie, že sa musí žiť smerom dopredu.“

Potvrdené výroky
Zdroj: Pre Teba, Bratislava: Lúč 2008, 50. týždeň.

Søren Kierkegaard Citáty o živote

„Trpezlivosť je sila duše, ktorú každý potrebuje, aby dosiahol v živote svoj cieľ.“

„Vnútorný život dnešného sveta je chorý. Keby som bol lekár a niekto by ma požiadal o radu, odpovedal by som: Vytváraj ticho a veď ľudí k tomu, aby mlčali!“

„O svojej večnosti rozhodujeme v tomto živote!“

Prisudzované výroky

„Život môže byť pochopený len vtedy, keď naň hľadíme späť, ale žitý iba vtedy, keď pozeráme dopredu.“

„Znášať utrpenie znamená mať s Bohom spoločné tajomstvo.“

Søren Kierkegaard citáty a výroky

„Aj dejiny sa odoberajú k Ježišovmu hrobu a musia konštatovať, že je to tak, ako povedali svedkovia. No jeho, zmŕtvychvstalého, nevidia. To nám neumožnia dejiny, ale viera.“

„Mám len jedného priateľa, a tým je ozvena. Prečo je to môj priateľ? Pretože milujem svoj smútok a ozvena mi ho neberie. Mám len jedného dôverníka, a tým je ticho noci. Prečo je to môj dôverník? Pretože mlčí.“

„Je neuveriteľné, akí vynaliezaví sú ľudia, aby sa mohli vyhnúť rozhodnutiam.“

„Keby som bol lekárom a dostal by som otázku: Čo radíš?, odpovedal by som: Vytváraj ticho. Privádzaj ľudí k mlčaniu. Ináč nebude počuť Božie slovo.“

„Najväčšou dokonalosťou človeka je to, že potrebuje Boha.“

„Smútok je v skutočnosti založený na tom, že čestne a bez podvodov odráža čisto ľudským spôsobom, aké je byť dieťaťom.“

„Väčšina ľudí sa naháňa za pôžitkami v takom chvate, že neraz prebehnú popri nich.“

„Zdá sa, že ľuďom bola daná reč nie preto, aby vyslovili svoje myšlienky, ale aby zastierali, že žiadne nemajú.“

„Predovšetkým nezabúdaj na svoju povinnosť milovať seba samého.“

„Buď to urobíte, alebo nie - budete ľutovať oboje.“

„Človeka navádzaj mlčať. Jedine tak môže počuť Božie Slovo.“

„Mnohí z nás sa v spôsobe čítania Biblie podobajú myške, ktorá sa pokúša chytiť syr z pasce, a pritom sa do nej nechytiť.“

Prisudzované výroky

„Úzkostlivosť je závrat zo slobody.“

„Úlohou modlitby nie je ovplyvňovať Boha, ale skôr meniť povahu toho, kto sa modlí.“

„Kto za to môže, ak nie ona a tretí faktor, o ktorom nikto nevie, odkiaľ pochádza, ktorý ma pohol svojím podnetom a premenil ma?“

„Čo sa nikdy nezmení, aj keď sa všetko zmení? Láska!“

„Čo možno vziať a čo zároveň všetko berie? Láska!“

Prisudzované výroky

„Čo možno dať a čo všetko dáva? Láska!“

Prisudzované výroky

„Mnoho vecí môže človek vykonať za druhých. Veriť nie.“

Prisudzované výroky

„Paradox nás vždy stavia pred voľbu, rozhodnutie Buď - alebo. Zodpovednosť za voľbu nesieme sami.“

„Stať sa kresťanom môžeme pripodobniť k radikálnej liečbe, ktorú sa usilujeme čo najviac oddialiť.“

„Trpieť znamená mať spoločné tajomstvo s Bohom.“

„Existujú dva spôsoby, ako sa nechať oklamať. Jeden je veriť tomu, čo nie je pravda; druhý je odmietnuť uveriť tomu, čo je pravda.“

„Najbolestivejším stavom bytia je pripomínanie si budúcnosti, najmä tej, ktorú nikdy nebudete mať.“

„Odvážiť sa znamená na chvíľu stratiť pevnú pôdu pod nohami. Neodvážiť sa znamená stratiť samého seba.“

„Ľudia ma chápu tak zle, že ani nepochopia moju sťažnosť, že mi nerozumejú.“

„Všetko to vidím dokonale; sú dve možné situácie - buď môžeme urobiť to, alebo ono. Môj úprimný názor a moja priateľská rada znie: buď to urobte, alebo to nerobte - budete ľutovať oboje.“

“My hearers, this discourse has not wandered out into the world to look for conflict, it has not tried to get the better of anybody, it has not even tried to uphold anybody, as though there was battle without. It has spoken to you; not by way of explaining anything to you, but trying to speak secretly with you about your relationship to that secret wisdom mentioned in our text. Oh that nothing may upset you in respect to this, “neither life nor death nor things present nor things to come nor any other creature” (Romans 8:38) –not this discourse, which, though it may have profited you nothing, yet has striven for what after all is the first and the last, to help you have what the Scripture calls “faith in yourself before God” (Romans 14:22).”

Søren Kierkegaard: Citáty v angličtine

“That which distinguishes the Christian narrow way from the common human narrow way is the voluntary. Christ was not someone who coveted earthly things but had to be satisfied with poverty – no, he chose poverty.”

Zdroj: 1840s, Sermon Preached at Trinitatis Kirke, 1844, P. 173

“When Christianity came into the world the task was simply to proclaim Christianity. The same is the case wherever Christianity is introduced into a country the religion of which is not Christianity.
In "Christendom" the situation is a different one. What we have before us is not Christianity but a prodigious illusion, and the people are not pagans but live in the blissful conceit that they are Christians. So if in this situation Christianity is to be introduced, first of all the illusion must be disposed of.”

Sören Kierkegaard kniha For Self-Examination

Soren Kierkegaard, For Self-Examination, Hong p. 67
1850s, For Self-Examination (1851), Christ is the Way

“The immediacy of falling in love recognizes but one immediacy that is ebenburtig (of equal standing), and this is a religious immediacy; falling in love is too virginal to recognize any confidant other than God. But the religious is a new immediacy, has reflection in between-otherwise, paganism would actually be religious and Christianity not. That the religious is a new immediacy every person easily understands who is satisfied with following the honest path of ordinary common sense. And although I imagine I have but few readers, I confess nevertheless that I do imagine my readers to be among these, since I am far from wanting to instruct the admired ones, who make systematic discoveries a la Niels Klim, who have left their good skin in order to put on the “real appearance.””

Zdroj: 1850s, Attack upon Christendom (1855), p. 97

“If God stops a man on the road, and calls him with a revelation and sends him armed with divine authority among men, they say to him; from whom dost thou come? He answers: from God. But now God cannot help his messenger physically like a king, who gives him soldiers or policemen, or his ring or his signature, which is known to all; in short, God cannot help men by providing them with physical certainty that an Apostle is an Apostle-which would, moreover, be nonsense. Even miracles, if the Apostle has that gift, give no physical certainty; for the miracle is the object of faith.”

Sören Kierkegaard kniha Stages on Life's Way

Stages on Life's Way, p. 161-162
1840s, Stages on Life's Way (1845)

“Let others complain that the age is wicked; my complaint is that it is paltry; for it lacks passion. Men’s thoughts are thin and flimsy like lace, they are themselves pitiable like the lacemakers. The thoughts of their hearts are too paltry to be sinful. For a worm it might be regarded as a sin to harbor such thoughts, but not for a being made in the image of God. Their lusts are dull and sluggish, their passions sleepy. They do their duty, these shopkeeping souls, but they clip the coin a trifle, like the Jews; they think that even if the Lord keeps ever so careful a set of books, they may still cheat Him a little. Out upon them! This is the reason my soul always turns back to the Old Testament and to Shakespeare. I feel that those who speak there are at least human beings; they hate, they love, they murder their enemies, and curse their descendants throughout all generations, they sin.”

Zdroj: 1840s, Two Ethical-Religious Minor Essays (1849), p. 95

“Not merely in the realm of commerce but in the world of ideas as well our age is organizing a regular clearance sale. Everything is to be had at such a bargain that it is questionable whether in the end there is anybody who will want to bid. Every speculative price-fixer who conscientiously directs attention to the significant march of modern philosophy, every Privatdocent, tutor, and student, every crofter and cottar goes further. Perhaps it would be untimely and ill-timed to ask them where they are going.”

Swenson, 1959, p. 27
1840s, Either/Or (1843)

“However well-meaning and strong the individual man may be (if he could only use his strength), he still has not the passion to be able to tear himself from the coils and seductive uncertainty of reflection. Nor do his surroundings supply the events or produce the general enthusiasm necessary in order to free him. Instead of coming to his help, his milieu forms around him a negative intellectual opposition, which juggles for a moment with a deceptive prospect, only to deceive him in the end by pointing to a brilliant way out of the difficulty-by showing him that the shrewdest thing of all is to do nothing.”

Preface
1840s, Fear and Trembling (1843)

“What, exactly, have the errors of exegesis and philosophy done in order to confuse Christianity, and how have they confused Christianity? Quite briefly and categorically, they have simply forced back the sphere of paradox-religion into the sphere of aesthetics, and in consequence have succeeded in brings Christian terminology to such a pass that terms which, so long as they remain within their sphere, are qualitative categories, can be put to almost any use as clever expressions.”

The Present Age and of the Difference Between a Genius and an Apostle, translated by Alexander Dru (1962)
1840s, Two Ages: A Literary Review (1846)

“Out of love, God becomes man. He says: "See, here is what it is to be a human being."”

Of The Difference Between A Genius And An Apostle, Alexander Dru translation 1962 p. 89
1840s, Two Ethical-Religious Minor Essays (1849)

“You wanted God’s ideas about what was best for you to coincide with your ideas, but you also wanted him to be the almighty Creator of heaven and earth so that he could properly fulfill your wish. And yet, if he were to share your ideas, he would cease to be the almighty Father.”

Zdroj: 1840s, The Sickness unto Death (July 30, 1849), p. 161

“Alas, time comes and time goes, it subtracts little by little; then it deprives a person of a good, the loss of which he indeed feels, and his pain is great. Alas, and he does not discover that long ago it has already taken away from him the most important thing of all-the capacity to make a resolution-and it has made him so familiar with this condition that there is no consternation over it, the last thing that could help gain new power for renewed resolution!”

Sören Kierkegaard kniha Eighteen Upbuilding Discourses

Søren Kierkegaard, Eighteen Upbuilding Discourses, Hong p. 37
1840s, Upbuilding Discourses (1843-1844)

“If someone were to expound that godliness is to belong to childhood in the temporal sense and thus dwindle and die with the years as childhood does, is to be a happy frame of mind that cannot be preserved but only recollected; if someone were to expound that repentance as a weakness of old age accompanies the decline of one’s powers, when the senses are dulled, when sleep no longer strengthens but increases lethargy-this would be ungodliness and foolishness.”

Zdroj: 1840s, Three Discourses on Imagined Occasions (1845), p. 48

“People are scarcely aware that it is a slavery they are creating; they forget this in their zeal to make people free by overthrowing dominions. They are scarcely aware that it is slavery; how could it be possible to be a slave in relation to equals?”

Upbuilding Discourses in Various Spirits, Hong p. 12
1840s

“What if the equality between us human being, in which we completely resemble one another, were that none of us really thinks about his being loved? Preface P. 166”

Søren Kierkegaard, Upbuilding Discourses in Various Spirits, Hong p. 327
1840s, Upbuilding Discourses in Various Spirits (1847)

“In the Church which was founded at Corinth, St. Paul had special difficulties of the kind I have mentioned. In that flourishing commercial city, which through its shipping and situation, maintained a vital connexion between East and West, numerous crowds of people flocked together from all quarters, different in speech and in culture. As they mingled with the inhabitants, they produced, by contacts and contrasts, new and ever new differences. Even in the Church this differentiation endeavoured to make itself felt in sects and parties; and a kind of pagan wisdom made a special attempt to force itself forward as a teacher of truth. In his first letter to this church, from which the text I read is taken, St. Paul strongly combats this tendency.”

1850s, Two Discourses at Friday Communion (August 1851)

“He fixed his definition thus: reflection is the possibility of the relation, consciousness is the relation, the first form of which is contradiction. He soon noted that, as a result, the categories of reflection are always dichotomous. For example ideality and reality, soul and body, to recognize – the true, to will – the good, to love – the beautiful, God and the world, and so on, these are categories of reflection. In reflection, these touch each other in such a way that a relation becomes possible. The categories of consciousness, on the other hand, are trichotomous, as language itself indicates, for when I say I am conscious of this, I mention a trinity. Consciousness is mind and spirit, and the remarkable thing is that when in the world of mind or spirit one is divided, it always becomes three and never two. Consciousness, therefore, presupposes reflection. If this were not true it would be impossible to explain doubt. True, language seems to contest this, since in most languages, as far as he knew, the word ‘doubt’ is etymologically related to the word ‘two’. Yet in his opinion this only indicated the presupposition of doubt, especially because it was clear to him that as soon as I, as spirit, become two, I am eo ipso three. If there were nothing but dichotomies, doubt would not exist, for the possibility of doubt lies precisely in that third which places the two in relation to each other. One cannot therefore say that reflection produces doubt, unless one expressed oneself backwards; one must say that doubt presupposes reflection, though not in a temporal sense. Doubt arises through a relation between two, but for this to take place the two must exist, although doubt, as a higher expression, comes before rather than afterwards.”

Zdroj: 1840s, Sermon Preached at Trinitatis Kirke, 1844, P. 162

“Christ calls it (O give heed!), He calls it “hypocrisy.” And not only that, but He says (now shudder!), He says that this guilt of hypocrisy is as great, precisely as great a crime as that of killing the prophets. … This then is the judgment, Christ's judgment upon "Christendom."”

Johannes Climacus (1841) p. 80-81
1840s, Johannes Climacus (1841)

“Death induces the sensual person to say: Let us eat and drink, because tomorrow we shall die – but this is sensuality’s cowardly lust for life, that contemptible order of things where one lives in order to eat and drink instead of eating and drinking in order to live.”

Shudder; for if you do not, you are implicated in it.
Zdroj: 1850s, Attack upon Christendom (1855), p. 122

“And thus Christianity is played in “Christendom.” Artists in dramatic costumes make their appearance in artistic buildings— there really is no danger at all, anything but that: the teacher is a royal functionary, steadily promoted, making a career— and how he dramatically plays Christianity, in short, he plays comedy. He lectures about renunciation, but he himself is being steadily promoted; he teaches all that about despising worldly titles and rank, but he himself is making a career.”

Zdroj: 1840s, Three Discourses on Imagined Occasions (1845), p. 83

“What is asked of a man that he may be able to pray for his enemies? To pray for one’s enemies is the hardest thing of all. That is why it exasperates us so much in our present day situation.”

Zdroj: 1850s, Attack upon Christendom (1855), p. 121

“The question is asked in ignorance, by one who does not even know what can have led him to ask it.”

Journals and Papers X4A 435
1840s, The Journals of Søren Kierkegaard, 1840s

“In the New Testament sense, to be a Christian is, in an upward sense, as different from being a man as, in a downward sense, to be a man is different from being a beast. A Christian in the sense of the New Testament, although he stands suffering in the midst of life’s reality, has yet become completely a stranger to this life; in the words of the Scripture and also of the Collects (which still are read-O bloody satire!-by the sort of priests we now have, and in the ears of the sort of Christians that now live) he is a stranger and a pilgrim-just think, for example of the late Bishop Mynster intoning, “We are strangers and pilgrims in this world”! A Christian in the New Testament sense is literally a stranger and a pilgrim, he feels himself a stranger, and everyone involuntarily feels that this man is a stranger to him.”

Preface
1840s, Philosophical Fragments (1844)

“A genius and an Apostle are qualitatively different, they are definitions which each belong in their own spheres: the sphere of immanence, and the sphere of transcendence.”

Attack Upon Christianity, The Instant, No. 7, Søren Kierkegaard, 1854-1855, Walter Lowrie 1944, 1968
1850s, Attack upon Christendom (1855)

“Irony is a qualification of subjectivity.”

Zdroj: 1840s, Two Ethical-Religious Minor Essays (1849), P. 90-91

“Source: Without Authority by Soren Kierkegaard, Hong 1997 P. 145ff”

1840s, On the Concept of Irony with Continual Reference to Socrates (1841)

“The next thing you can learn from the woman who was a sinner, something she herself understood, is that with regard to finding forgiveness she is able to do nothing at all. P. 155”

1850s, An Upbuilding Discourse December 20, 1850

“He lived year after year. He attended only to himself and to God and this picture-but he did not understand himself.”

1850s, An Upbuilding Discourse December 20, 1850

“This is approximately the way Christendom relates to the essentially Christian, the unconditioned. After seventeen, eighteen detours and running all around someone finally has his finite existence assured, and then we receive a sermon about Seek first the kingdom of God. Is this sobriety or is this intoxication? p. 112”

Zdroj: 1840s, Two Ethical-Religious Minor Essays (1849), p. 57

“Editor’s Preface In this book, originating in the year 1848, the requirement for being a Christian is forced up by the pseudonymous author to the supreme ideality. Yet the requirement should indeed be stated, presented, and heard. From the Christian point of view, there ought to be no scaling down of the requirement, nor suppression of it-instead of a personal admission and confession. The requirement should be heard-and I understand what is said as spoken to me alone—so that I might learn not only to resort to grace but to resort to it in relation to the use of grace. S. K.”

1850s, Judge For Yourselves! 1851 (1876)