John Rawls citáty

John Rawls bol americký sociálny filozof, filozof politiky, filozof morálky a filozof kultúry.

Sústreďoval sa na normatívnu praktickú filozofiu a rozpracúvanie teórie spravodlivosti, ktorú koncipoval ako alternatívu k utilitarizmu. V protiklade k utilitarizmu Rawls zastával prednosť spravodlivosti pred dobrom, to znamená pred perspektivou konsekvencionalistickej sumy úžitku. Najvyššiu normatívnu kvalitu preto majú deontologické zásady spravodlivosti, ktoré Rawls vykazuje pomocou fiktívneho prvotného stavu. Tieto zásady charakterizujú spravodlivosť ako fairness .

Fikciu prvotného stavu možno opísať takto: Vezmime určitý počet osôb, ktoré majú za úlohu spoločne stanoviť zásady spoločenského poriadku, v ktorom budú musieť potom sami žiť. Predpokladajme, že každá z tychto osôb je rozumná, ide jej o jej vlastný prospech a má určitý zmysel pre spravodlivosť. Ďalej predpokladajme, že žiadna z týchto osôb nevie, aký bude mať v tejto spoločnosti kultúrny kontext, ku ktorej triede alebo vrstve či generácii bude patriť, aké bude mať nadanie, pohlavie alebo zdravotný stav. Tieto osoby sa teda zaraďujú pod závoj nevedenia. Tento závoj spôsobuje, že subjektívne záujmy a preferencie sú bezpredmetné. Aké zásady si tieto osoby zvolia?

Spolu so závojom nevedenia definujú tieto podmienky zásady spravodlivosti ako zásady, na ktorych by sa zhodli rozumní, sebe rovní ľudia, ktorí sledujú svoje záujmy, ak nie je o nikom známe, že mu prírodné alebo spoločenské okolnosti dávajú väčšie alebo menšie výhody. Tieto osoby by sa nevyhnutne rozhodli pre dve zásady:



Zásadu čo možno najväčšej slobody: Každý má rovnaké právo na čo najrozsiahleší celkový systém rovnakých základných slobôd, ktorý je možný pre všetkých.

Zásadu zahrnujúcu a princíp rozdielov a b princíp čestnej rovnosti šancí: Sociálne a hospodárske nerovnosti musia mať nasledujúcu povahu:a musia pri obmedzení spravodlivej zásady úspornosti prinášať jednotlivcom najmenej obdareným čo možno najväčšiu výhodu ab musia byť spojené s úradmi a pozíciami, ktoré sú otvorené všetkým podľa zásady čestnej rovnosti šancí.Zásada úspornosti, o ktorej je zmienka v princípe rozdielov, zohľadňuje záujmy budúcich generácií.

Na základe týchto hlavných deontologických zásad spravodlivosti, rozvíja Rawls dvojstupňovú teoriu dobra:



V slabej teórii dobra ide o individuálne blaho človeka, ktoré definuje ako úspešné splnenie rozumného životného plánu v rámci spravodlivého poriadku. Relevantné sú tu všetky statky, ktoré majú nejakú úlohu v rozumnom životnom pláne, teda sloboda a šance, príjem a majetok, a sebaúcta. Podľa tejto slabej teórie sa orientujú osoby v prvotnom stave, kedy v zmysle svojich záujmov koncipujú princípy spravodlivosti. Slabá teoria dobra je potrebná na vysvetlenie rozumného priania základných statkov a pojem rozumnosti, ktorý je v základe voľby zásad v prvotnom stave. Z tejto teórie vyplývajú predpoklady, ktoré sú nevyhnutné pre vyvodenie zásad spravodlivosti.

V úplnej teórii dobra ide o dobrého, t. zn. mravne hodnotného človeka, ktorého možno charakterizovať ako toho, kto v nadpriemernej miere vykazuje základné vlastnosti mravnej osobnosti, ktoré si ľudia pri sebe navzájom želajú v prvotnom stave. Pretože sú stanovené zásady spravodlivosti a predpokladá sa úplná zhoda, každý vie, že si bude v spoločnosti priať, aby ostatní mali mravné zmýšľanie, ktoré smeruje k zachovaniu tychto zásad.Dobrá spoločnosť je taká, kde sú nielen etablované zásady spravodlivosti, ale aj verejné vedomie je určované zmyslom pre spravodlivosť.

Rawlsova teória spravodlivosti prijíma Aristotelovu teóriu cností. Wikipedia  

✵ 21. február 1921 – 24. november 2002
John Rawls: 64   citátov 0   Páči sa

John Rawls citáty a výroky

John Rawls: Citáty v angličtine

“The natural distribution is neither just nor unjust; nor is it unjust that persons are born into society at some particular position. These are simply natural facts. What is just and unjust is the way that institutions deal with these facts.”

John Rawls kniha A Theory of Justice

Zdroj: A Theory of Justice (1971; 1975; 1999), Chapter II, Section 14, pg. 87-88
Kontext: Occasionally this reflection is offered as an excuse for ignoring injustice, as if the refusal to acquiesce in injustice is on a par with being unable to accept death. The natural distribution is neither just nor unjust; nor is it unjust that persons are born into society at some particular position. These are simply natural facts. What is just and unjust is the way that institutions deal with these facts.
Kontext: We may reject the contention that the ordering of institutions is always defective because the distribution of natural talents and the contingencies of social circumstance are unjust, and this injustice must inevitably carry over to human arrangements. Occasionally this reflection is offered as an excuse for ignoring injustice, as if the refusal to acquiesce in injustice is on a par with being unable to accept death. The natural distribution is neither just nor unjust; nor is it unjust that persons are born into society at some particular position. These are simply natural facts. What is just and unjust is the way that institutions deal with these facts. Aristocratic and caste societies are unjust because they make these contingencies the ascriptive basis for belonging to more or less enclosed and privileged social classes. The basic structure of these societies incorporates the arbitrariness found in nature. But there is no necessity for men to resign themselves to these contingencies. The social system is not an unchangeable order beyond human control but a pattern of human action. In justice as fairness men agree to avail themselves of the accidents of nature and social circumstance only when doing so is for the common benefit. The two principles are a fair way of meeting the arbitrariness of fortune; and while no doubt imperfect in other ways, the institutions which satisfy these principles are just.

“Each person possesses an inviolability founded on justice that even the welfare of society as a whole cannot override.”

John Rawls kniha A Theory of Justice

Zdroj: A Theory of Justice (1971; 1975; 1999), Chapter I, Section 1, pg. 3-4
Kontext: Justice is the first virtue of social institutions, as truth is of systems of thought. A theory however elegant and economical must be rejected or revised if it is untrue; likewise laws and institutions no matter how efficient and well-arranged must be reformed or abolished if they are unjust. Each person possesses an inviolability founded on justice that even the welfare of society as a whole cannot override. For this reason justice denies that the loss of freedom for some is made right by a greater good shared by others. It does not allow that the sacrifices imposed on a few are outweighed by the larger sum of advantages enjoyed by many. Therefore in a just society the liberties of equal citizenship are taken as settled; the rights secured by justice are not subject to political bargaining or to the calculus of social interests.

“The intolerant can be viewed as free-riders, as persons who seek the advantages of just institutions while not doing their share to uphold them.”

John Rawls kniha A Theory of Justice

Zdroj: A Theory of Justice (1971; 1975; 1999), Chapter VI, Section 59, pg. 388

“The concept of justice I take to be defined, then, by the role of its principles in assigning rights and duties and in defining the appropriate division of social advantages.”

John Rawls kniha A Theory of Justice

Zdroj: A Theory of Justice (1971; 1975; 1999), Chapter I, Section 2, pg. 10
Kontext: The concept of justice I take to be defined, then, by the role of its principles in assigning rights and duties and in defining the appropriate division of social advantages. A conception of justice is an interpretation of this role.

“I have tried to set forth a theory that enables us to understand and to assess these feelings about the primacy of justice.”

John Rawls kniha A Theory of Justice

Zdroj: A Theory of Justice (1971; 1975; 1999), Chapter IX, Section 87, p. 586
Kontext: I have tried to set forth a theory that enables us to understand and to assess these feelings about the primacy of justice. Justice as fairness is the outcome: it articulates these opinions and supports their general tendency.

“Justice is the first virtue of social institutions, as truth is of systems of thought.”

John Rawls kniha A Theory of Justice

Zdroj: A Theory of Justice (1971; 1975; 1999), Chapter I, Section 1, pg. 3-4
Kontext: Justice is the first virtue of social institutions, as truth is of systems of thought. A theory however elegant and economical must be rejected or revised if it is untrue; likewise laws and institutions no matter how efficient and well-arranged must be reformed or abolished if they are unjust. Each person possesses an inviolability founded on justice that even the welfare of society as a whole cannot override. For this reason justice denies that the loss of freedom for some is made right by a greater good shared by others. It does not allow that the sacrifices imposed on a few are outweighed by the larger sum of advantages enjoyed by many. Therefore in a just society the liberties of equal citizenship are taken as settled; the rights secured by justice are not subject to political bargaining or to the calculus of social interests.

“We cannot at the end count them a second time because we do not like the result.”

John Rawls kniha A Theory of Justice

Zdroj: A Theory of Justice (1971; 1975; 1999), Chapter III, Section 23, pg. 135
Kontext: The claims of existing social arrangements and of self interest have been duly allowed for. We cannot at the end count them a second time because we do not like the result.

“The principles of justice are chosen behind a veil of ignorance.”

John Rawls kniha A Theory of Justice

Zdroj: A Theory of Justice (1971; 1975; 1999), Chapter I, Section 3, pg. 12

“There are infinitely many variations of the initial situation and therefore no doubt indefinitely many theorems of moral geometry.”

John Rawls kniha A Theory of Justice

Zdroj: A Theory of Justice (1971; 1975; 1999), Chapter III, Section 21, pg. 126

“I have assumed throughout that the persons in the original position are rational.”

John Rawls kniha A Theory of Justice

Zdroj: A Theory of Justice (1971; 1975; 1999), Chapter III, Section 25, pg. 142

“A just system must generate its own support.”

John Rawls kniha A Theory of Justice

Zdroj: A Theory of Justice (1971; 1975; 1999), Chapter V, Section 41, p. 261

“An individual who finds that he enjoys seeing others in positions of lesser liberty understands that he has no claim whatever to this enjoyment.”

John Rawls kniha A Theory of Justice

Zdroj: A Theory of Justice (1971; 1975; 1999), Chapter I, Section 6, pg. 31

“In justice as fairness society is interpreted as a cooperative venture for mutual advantage.”

John Rawls kniha A Theory of Justice

Zdroj: A Theory of Justice (1971; 1975; 1999), Chapter II, Section 14, pg. 84

“Intuitionism is not constructive, perfectionism is unacceptable.”

John Rawls kniha A Theory of Justice

Zdroj: A Theory of Justice (1971; 1975; 1999), Chapter I, Section 9, pg. 52

“Ideal legislators do not vote their interests.”

John Rawls kniha A Theory of Justice

Zdroj: A Theory of Justice (1971; 1975; 1999), Chapter V, Section 43, p. 284

“Ideally a just constitution would be a just procedure arranged to insure a just outcome.”

John Rawls kniha A Theory of Justice

Zdroj: A Theory of Justice (1971; 1975; 1999), Chapter IV, Section 31, pg. 197

“Indeed, it is tempting to suppose that it is self evident that things should be so arranged so as to lead to the most good.”

John Rawls kniha A Theory of Justice

Zdroj: A Theory of Justice (1971; 1975; 1999), Chapter I, Section 5, pg. 25

“The hazards of the generalized prisoner's dilemma are removed by the match between the right and the good.”

John Rawls kniha A Theory of Justice

Zdroj: A Theory of Justice (1971; 1975; 1999), Chapter IX, Section 86, p. 577

“It may be expedient but it is not just that some should have less in order that others may prosper.”

John Rawls kniha A Theory of Justice

Zdroj: A Theory of Justice (1971; 1975; 1999), Chapter I, Section 3, pg. 15

“The fundamental criterion for judging any procedure is the justice of its likely results.”

John Rawls kniha A Theory of Justice

Zdroj: A Theory of Justice (1971; 1975; 1999), Chapter IV, Section 37, p. 230

Podobní autori

George Santayana fotka
George Santayana 12
španielsko-americký filozof 20.storočia spájaný s pragma...
Jim Rohn fotka
Jim Rohn 16
americký motivačný rečník
Martin Heidegger fotka
Martin Heidegger 7
nemecký filozof
Robert Fulghum fotka
Robert Fulghum 54
americký spisovateľ
Ludwig Wittgenstein fotka
Ludwig Wittgenstein 13
rakúsko-britský filozof
Emil Cioran fotka
Emil Cioran 24
rumunský filozof a esejista
Pierre Teilhard De Chardin fotka
Pierre Teilhard De Chardin 22
francúzsky filozof a jezuitský kňaz
Paul Valéry fotka
Paul Valéry 28
francúzsky básnik, esejista a filozof
José Ortega Y Gasset fotka
José Ortega Y Gasset 21
španielsky liberálny filozof a esejista
Tomáš Halík fotka
Tomáš Halík 28
český filozof, psychológ, religionista, sociológ, teológ ...