Jeremy Bentham citátov

Jeremy Bentham fotka
11   198

Jeremy Bentham

Dátum narodenia: 15. február 1748
Dátum úmrtia: 6. jún 1832

Reklama

Jeremy Bentham bol anglický etik a právnik, teoretik liberalizmu.

Podobní autori

Havelock Henry Ellis fotka
Havelock Henry Ellis10
britský lekár, spisovateľ a sociálny reformátor
Rabíndranáth Thákur fotka
Rabíndranáth Thákur39
bengálsky vševed
Adolph Kolping fotka
Adolph Kolping1
nemecký katolícky kňaz
Heinrich Zschokke fotka
Heinrich Zschokke1
nemecký spisovateľ
William Hazlitt fotka
William Hazlitt3
anglický spisovateľ, sociálny odborník a filozof
Walter Benjamin fotka
Walter Benjamin13
nemecký literárny kritik, filozof a sociálny kritik
  Konfucius fotka
Konfucius118
čínsky učiteľ, editor, politik a filozof
Johann Heinrich Pestalozzi fotka
Johann Heinrich Pestalozzi14
švajčiarsky pedagóg a reformátor vzdelávania
Francis Bacon fotka
Francis Bacon102
anglický filozof, štátnik, vedec, právnik a autor
John Locke fotka
John Locke11
anglický filozof a lekár

Citáty Jeremy Bentham

Reklama
Reklama

„Judges of elegance and taste consider themselves as benefactors to the human race, whilst they are really only the interrupters of their pleasure“

—  Jeremy Bentham
Context: Judges of elegance and taste consider themselves as benefactors to the human race, whilst they are really only the interrupters of their pleasure … There is no taste which deserves the epithet good, unless it be the taste for such employments which, to the pleasure actually produced by them, conjoin some contingent or future utility: there is no taste which deserves to be characterized as bad, unless it be a taste for some occupation which has mischievous tendency. Théorie des peines et des récompenses (1811); translation by Richard Smith, The Rationale of Reward, J. & H. L. Hunt, London, 1825, Bk. 3, Ch. 1

Reklama

„Every law is an evil, for every law is an infraction of liberty: And I repeat that government has but a choice of evils“

—  Jeremy Bentham
Context: It is with government, as with medicine. They have both but a choice of evils. Every law is an evil, for every law is an infraction of liberty: And I repeat that government has but a choice of evils: In making this choice, what ought to be the object of the legislator? He ought to assure himself of two things; 1st, that in every case, the incidents which he tries to prevent are really evils; and 2ndly, that if evils, they are greater than those which he employs to prevent them. There are then two things to be regarded; the evil of the offence and the evil of the law; the evil of the malady and the evil of the remedy. An evil comes rarely alone. A lot of evil cannot well fall upon an individual without spreading itself about him, as about a common centre. In the course of its progress we see it take different shapes: we see evil of one kind issue from evil of another kind; evil proceed from good and good from evil. All these changes, it is important to know and to distinguish; in this, in fact, consists the essence of legislation. Principles of Legislation (1830), Ch. X : Analysis of Political Good and Evil; How they are spread in society

„The day may come when the rest of the animal creation may acquire those rights which never could have been withholden from them but by the hand of tyranny.“

—  Jeremy Bentham
Context: The day has been, I grieve to say in many places it is not yet past, in which the greater part of the species, under the denomination of slaves, have been treated by the law exactly upon the same footing as, in England for example, the inferior races of animals are still. The day may come when the rest of the animal creation may acquire those rights which never could have been withholden from them but by the hand of tyranny. The French have already discovered that the blackness of the skin is no reason why a human being should be abandoned without redress to the caprice of a tormentor. It may one day come to be recognized that the number of legs, the villosity of the skin, or the termination of the os sacrum are reasons equally insufficient for abandoning a sensitive being to the same fate. What else is it that should trace the insuperable line? Is it the faculty of reason, or perhaps the faculty of discourse? But a full-grown horse or dog is beyond comparison a more rational, as well as a more conversable animal, than an infant of a day or a week or even a month, old. But suppose they were otherwise, what would it avail? The question is not Can they reason?, nor Can they talk?, but Can they suffer? Ch. 17 : Of the Limits of the Penal Branch of Jurisprudence

„He ought to assure himself of two things; 1st, that in every case, the incidents which he tries to prevent are really evils; and 2ndly, that if evils, they are greater than those which he employs to prevent them.“

—  Jeremy Bentham
Context: It is with government, as with medicine. They have both but a choice of evils. Every law is an evil, for every law is an infraction of liberty: And I repeat that government has but a choice of evils: In making this choice, what ought to be the object of the legislator? He ought to assure himself of two things; 1st, that in every case, the incidents which he tries to prevent are really evils; and 2ndly, that if evils, they are greater than those which he employs to prevent them. There are then two things to be regarded; the evil of the offence and the evil of the law; the evil of the malady and the evil of the remedy. An evil comes rarely alone. A lot of evil cannot well fall upon an individual without spreading itself about him, as about a common centre. In the course of its progress we see it take different shapes: we see evil of one kind issue from evil of another kind; evil proceed from good and good from evil. All these changes, it is important to know and to distinguish; in this, in fact, consists the essence of legislation. Principles of Legislation (1830), Ch. X : Analysis of Political Good and Evil; How they are spread in society

„Nature has placed mankind under the governance of two sovereign masters, pain and pleasure. It is for them alone to point out what we ought to do, as well as to determine what we shall do.“

—  Jeremy Bentham
Context: Nature has placed mankind under the governance of two sovereign masters, pain and pleasure. It is for them alone to point out what we ought to do, as well as to determine what we shall do. On the one hand the standard of right and wrong, on the other the chain of causes and effects, are fastened to their throne. They govern us in all we do, in all we say, in all we think: every effort we can make to throw off our subjection, will serve but to demonstrate and confirm it. In words a man may pretend to abjure their empire: but in reality he will remain subject to it all the while. The principle of utility recognizes this subjection, and assumes it for the foundation of that system, the object of which is to rear the fabric of felicity by the hands of reason and of law. Systems which attempt to question it, deal in sounds instead of sense, in caprice instead of reason, in darkness instead of light. Ch. 1 : Of the Principle of Utility

Ďalšie
Dnešné výročie
John Goodman fotka
John Goodman2
americký herec, hlasový umelec a komik 1952
Orlando Aloysius Battista6
kanadský chemik 1917 - 1995
Emil Cioran fotka
Emil Cioran16
rumunský filozof a esejista 1911 - 1995
Ďalších 18 výročí
Podobní autori
Havelock Henry Ellis fotka
Havelock Henry Ellis10
britský lekár, spisovateľ a sociálny reformátor
Rabíndranáth Thákur fotka
Rabíndranáth Thákur39
bengálsky vševed
Adolph Kolping fotka
Adolph Kolping1
nemecký katolícky kňaz
Heinrich Zschokke fotka
Heinrich Zschokke1
nemecký spisovateľ
William Hazlitt fotka
William Hazlitt3
anglický spisovateľ, sociálny odborník a filozof